<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Items Tagged ‘digital production’ at karlstolley.com</title>
  <link>http://karlstolley.com/tags/digital-production</link>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <description>Notes and posts tagged ‘digital production.’</description>
  <item>
    <title>Digital Production As Inquiry</title>    <link>http://karlstolley.com/blog/2008-06-22/digital-production-as-inquiry.htm</link>
    <guid>http://karlstolley.com/blog/2008-06-22/digital-production-as-inquiry.htm</guid>    <description>What appears to be a bug in a piece of open source software prompts me to share an argument that I’m in the early stages of developing.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 23:04:06 -0500</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Note</title>    <link>http://karlstolley.com/notes/2008-03-24/</link>    <description>Is a possible activity-theory based critique of WYSIWYG digital production that WYSIWYG takes what, at the code level, would be actions and moves them down, outside of a human agent, to the level of operations? And that making so many actions (e.g., bolding text) into operations shared across, say, a Web editor and a Word processor, clouds the entire idea of the activity of digital production?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:01:17 -0500</pubDate>
  </item></channel>
</rss>